Skip to content
English
  • There are no suggestions because the search field is empty.

Jurisprudence 

Pronotif is fully justified in light of the Quebec legal framework. The Code of Civil Procedure, adopted in 2014, describes notification as "any appropriate method that allows the person notifying to constitute proof of the delivery, sending, transmission or publication of the document (...) in particular by a bailiff, by mail, by delivery of the document, by technological means or by public notice."  

The Act respecting the legal framework for information technology (the "Act") is the reference framework in this area. This Act provides, among other things, that a document constitutes a set of information carried by a medium, which can be rendered using any method of writing. In other words, the medium can be physical or technological and the way in which it contains the information has no impact on the definition of a document.
The Act also provides that the legal value of a document is neither increased nor decreased for the sole reason that a specific medium (physical or technological) has been chosen and that a document has the same value regardless of the medium used, provided that its integrity can be ensured. Integrity means that it is possible to demonstrate that the information contained is not altered and is maintained in its entirety, its medium providing the desired stability and durability.   Regarding transmission, the Act is clear on the validity of a communication made by a technological method.

First, it states that a document can be "transmitted, sent or dispatched by any mode of transmission appropriate to its medium", unless the law requires the exclusive use of a specific method. Nothing in the rules of law on residential leases provides for the use of a specific method.   But what about receipt? The Act indicates that the document is presumed to be received or delivered when it becomes accessible at the address that the recipient indicates is the location where he agrees to receive a document from him, to the extent that the address is active. 

Pronotif represents a certain interest, since the process it uses guarantees the reliability of the information transmitted to the recipient and constitutes a legally valid method of transmitting documents.  

In the following decisions, the Régie recognized the validity of Pronotif. 

  • Shah v. Edwards-Daugherty 2017 QCRDL 4287 ;
  • Propriétés DCV v. Biaye 2017 QCRDL 15611 ;
  • Propriétés DCV. v. El Hage 2017 QCRDL 15608 ;
  • DCV Estates v. Kammoonah 2017 QCRDL 15609 ;
  • DCV Properties v. Hamane 2017 QCRDL 15612 ;
  • DCV Estates v. Corne 2017 QCRDL 15614 ;
  • Immobilière Montérégienne IMR inc. v. Snoussi 2016 QCRDL 40347 ;
  • Gestion double RR v. Quenneville 2016 QCRDL 42579 ;
  • Immobilière montérégienne IMR inc. v. Colbert 2016 QCRDL 40853.
Note: Pronotif is an application developed taking into account the Quebec legal framework. Users can also use it for shipments outside Quebec, but caution is recommended until validation has been completed.